debasishjena
05-25 03:05 AM
Hi All,
I have I140 approved in EB3 in Jan 2011. I485 is still long time to go. Can I change my employer and apply in EB2 and port my priority date?
Thanks
I have I140 approved in EB3 in Jan 2011. I485 is still long time to go. Can I change my employer and apply in EB2 and port my priority date?
Thanks
wallpaper haircuts for teenage girls
eb3_nepa
07-18 02:17 PM
Did Amit(WaldenPond) get his GC , I have not seen any posts from him in recent past
I think we should remember and thank him for starting this effort.
Sorry for creating new thread for asking this question I tried asking in other thread which totally got lost and never answered.
His name is Aman not Amit.
I think we should remember and thank him for starting this effort.
Sorry for creating new thread for asking this question I tried asking in other thread which totally got lost and never answered.
His name is Aman not Amit.
puskeygadha
11-11 10:02 AM
My I-485 and I-140 was filed last week. I was wondering how many days it takes to get receit and .
when does the six month count down for AC21 begin???? Is it after receit date or fedex date..thnx
Please let me know
when does the six month count down for AC21 begin???? Is it after receit date or fedex date..thnx
Please let me know
2011 cute emo hairstyle in 2004
Joey Foley
January 3rd, 2005, 06:48 AM
Come on guys I think I have like 25 photos in my gallery now.
Hit me hard with the brutally honest truth of what you think. It helps me out a lot and I can't thank you enough.
Try to look through them all if you have time to spare.
Thanks and let me know.
Tips,suggestions? Keep'em coming.
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/2136
Hit me hard with the brutally honest truth of what you think. It helps me out a lot and I can't thank you enough.
Try to look through them all if you have time to spare.
Thanks and let me know.
Tips,suggestions? Keep'em coming.
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/2136
more...
rajpath
01-10 03:08 AM
Hi All,
My H1B(8+ year) is expiring, and my company is willing to file H1B with Engg manager role. My previous H1B or extension was files for software engineer. My GC(EB2) is filed as Software engineer, with PD as Jan 2006.
Questions
1) Now is it ok to file H1B with new title? What if H1B gets rejected?
2) How does this title change affect GC? Can the GC be cancelled because the title has changed or H1B gets rejected? The engg manager role is similar to software engneer role, except people responsiblities.
3) If the H1B gets accepted, then is there still a danger to GC? Do they verify GC papers before approving H1B?
Thank you, Raja
My H1B(8+ year) is expiring, and my company is willing to file H1B with Engg manager role. My previous H1B or extension was files for software engineer. My GC(EB2) is filed as Software engineer, with PD as Jan 2006.
Questions
1) Now is it ok to file H1B with new title? What if H1B gets rejected?
2) How does this title change affect GC? Can the GC be cancelled because the title has changed or H1B gets rejected? The engg manager role is similar to software engneer role, except people responsiblities.
3) If the H1B gets accepted, then is there still a danger to GC? Do they verify GC papers before approving H1B?
Thank you, Raja
fide_champ
03-19 06:33 PM
my company have applied for H1-B & H4 extension for myself and my wife. My wife now is looking to go for work and has got an offer from a company. The company will be doing a premium processing of my wife's H1-B and it is expected to be approved in 2 weeks. my wife has already held H1 status before, so she doesn't fall undr the cap. If my wife's H4 comes thru later, what status will she hold?
thanks
thanks
more...
Krilnon
07-30 03:00 AM
Basically everyone has experienced at least one version of the Falling Snow tutorial� It just so happens that you can see the progress that ActionScript has made as a language� as well as the progress that Kirupa has made in making tutorials. :trout:
I went with the 2.0-style snow because it translates best into shirt form. Enjoy!
http://reclipse.net/kirupa/tdc10/kril-fallingSnow_2.0.png
http://reclipse.net/kirupa/tdc10/kril-fallingSnow_2.0.png
I went with the 2.0-style snow because it translates best into shirt form. Enjoy!
http://reclipse.net/kirupa/tdc10/kril-fallingSnow_2.0.png
http://reclipse.net/kirupa/tdc10/kril-fallingSnow_2.0.png
2010 Funky Hairstyles Picture Cute
houston2005
07-25 10:07 AM
I got it recently from TSC, took almost 3 months.
more...
karn.anand
10-29 01:58 AM
:pleased:
Thank you for your supprt,
Now i have upload a new image
Thank you for your supprt,
Now i have upload a new image
hair pictures cute hairstyles cute
Blog Feeds
12-03 08:50 AM
More evidence things are not going well for Lou.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/cnbc-says-not-to-dobbs.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/cnbc-says-not-to-dobbs.html)
more...
Blog Feeds
03-31 03:40 PM
Good. Members of Congress who think Latino voters aren't paying attention and they can vote anti-immigrant to keep Tea Party activists happy may want to rethink that strategy. In related news. America's Voice has released poll data showing Latino voters are not energized and aren't planning on coming out in big numbers in November unless they seem some positive action on immigration reform. From America's Voice: Latino Decisions researcher and Stanford University professor Dr. Gary Segura highlighted and analyzed the findings: �Among all the key constituents in the 2008 Obama victory, Latino voters appear to be among the least enthusiastic...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/latino-groups-to-score-members-of-congress-on-immigration-issues.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/03/latino-groups-to-score-members-of-congress-on-immigration-issues.html)
hot cute hair cuts and colors
Macaca
10-01 08:04 AM
Taxes, Health Lead Hill Agenda (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/30/AR2007093001617.html?hpid=topnews) After Iraq Fight, Both Parties Welcome Shift By Jonathan Weisman | Washington Post Staff Writer, October 1, 2007
Out of a political stalemate over Iraq, domestic policy is surging to prominence on Capitol Hill, with Republicans and Democrats preparing for a time-honored clash over health care, tax policy, the scope of government and its role in America's problems at home.
The brewing veto fight this week over an expanded children's health insurance program is only the most visible sign of the new emphasis on domestic issues. Democratic White House hopefuls are resurrecting a push for universal health care while talking up tax policy, poverty and criminal justice. Democratic congressional leaders are revisiting Clinton-era battles over hate crimes and federal funding for local police forces.
The White House, at the urging of congressional Republican leaders, is spoiling for a fight on Democratic spending. And GOP leaders are looking for any opportunity for confrontations on illegal immigration and taxation.
At the heart of it all is a central question: Thirteen years after the 1994 Republican Revolution, has the country turned to the left in search of government solutions to intractable domestic problems?
Democrats think that the answer is yes. "As conditions deteriorate, Americans are asking, 'Who can make it better? Where can we look for help?' And not surprisingly, government is increasingly the answer," said Peter Hart, a Democratic pollster.
Even Republicans see a growing unease as the driving force in the domestic policy resurgence.
"There's no question the economy is good, but it's not a good for everybody," said House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio.). "When you look at family incomes, there hasn't been much rise. But there has been increased health-care costs, increased energy costs. They're nibbling up more than the family budget. It just drives more concerns."
For both parties, domestic policy fights are a welcome break after three election cycles dominated by terrorism and war. Republican and Democratic political leaders say they cannot shy away from the Iraq war. But for much of the year, the fight over the war has only shown Democrats to be ineffectual and Republicans to be intransigent.
For Democrats, a break in that fight could allow them to focus on issues that voters say demand attention. Last year's election victories by Democratic Sens. James Webb in Virginia and Jon Tester in Montana, and by Democratic governors in Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa and Ohio, show that a populist message can prevail even in swing states.
For Republicans, changing the subject is simply a relief.
"I think it is territory that tends to unite us more," said Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-Miss.). "Republicans tend to squabble, but when it's fiscal issues, when it's economic issues, we tend to come together. That's what makes us Republicans."
If so, the GOP may be having an identity crisis. Boehner, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and President Bush have met regularly on what Boehner calls his "rebranding" initiative: winning back for the GOP the mantle of fiscal discipline and limited government.
But in the first big domestic battle on Capitol Hill, 18 Republicans in the Senate and 45 in the House abandoned their leaders to side with the Democrats on a five-year, $35 billion expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program.
House Republicans are expected to muster enough votes to sustain Bush's anticipated veto of the SCHIP bill, but Boehner conceded that Congress is liable to override the promised veto on a $21 billion water-project bill so crammed with home-district projects that it has been denounced by taxpayer and environmental groups alike.
"There's deadlock on Iraq. Bush is intransigent. It's clear we're not going to get the 60 votes to change course on the war. But Republicans are hurting too, so they're breaking with him on all these domestic issues," said Sen. Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
Indeed, on the domestic front Republicans may be in the same bind that they face on foreign policy: Their conservative base is not where the rest of the country is.
For more than a decade, the Democratic polling firm Hart Research and the Republican firm Public Opinion Strategies have read two propositions to Americans: "Government should do more to solve problems and help meet the needs of people" and "Government is doing too many things better left to businesses and individuals."
In December 1995, at the height of the Republican Revolution, a less-intrusive government won out, 62 percent to 32 percent. This month, a more activist government won out, 55 percent to 38 percent. Independent voters sided with government activism, 52 percent to 39 percent.
But Republican voters, by a margin of 62 to 32 percent, still say government is doing too much.
"The big tectonic plates of American politics are shifting, and the old Republican policies of limited government aren't working like they used to," Schumer said. "Their problem is, the Republican primary vote is still the old George Bush coalition -- strong foreign policy, cut taxes, cut government, family values. But Americans aren't there anymore."
But the same poll did find some hope for the GOP, said Neil Newhouse, a partner at Public Opinion Strategies. Americans said they do not see a role for the federal government in the current mortgage crisis.
"Americans seem to be saying that the problems the country is facing demand a more activist government, but that this does not extend to all issues or every problem," Newhouse said.
That's a difficult needle to thread, but it can be done, said former senator Jim Talent (R-Mo.), a top domestic policy adviser to Republican White House hopeful Mitt Romney. Then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush showed in 2000, with his stand on education and his general slogan of "compassionate conservatism," that Republicans can win on traditional Democratic turf. They can do that again, especially on health care, Talent said.
"Part of what is at the core of the party is smaller government, fiscal restraint," said Sen. Mel Martinez (Fla.), general chairman of the Republican National Committee. "But like in this debate on SCHIP, it's very important that we as Republicans make it clear we are for insuring children."
"It's no longer permissible for us to think 47 million Americans being uninsured is okay," Martinez said.
Out of a political stalemate over Iraq, domestic policy is surging to prominence on Capitol Hill, with Republicans and Democrats preparing for a time-honored clash over health care, tax policy, the scope of government and its role in America's problems at home.
The brewing veto fight this week over an expanded children's health insurance program is only the most visible sign of the new emphasis on domestic issues. Democratic White House hopefuls are resurrecting a push for universal health care while talking up tax policy, poverty and criminal justice. Democratic congressional leaders are revisiting Clinton-era battles over hate crimes and federal funding for local police forces.
The White House, at the urging of congressional Republican leaders, is spoiling for a fight on Democratic spending. And GOP leaders are looking for any opportunity for confrontations on illegal immigration and taxation.
At the heart of it all is a central question: Thirteen years after the 1994 Republican Revolution, has the country turned to the left in search of government solutions to intractable domestic problems?
Democrats think that the answer is yes. "As conditions deteriorate, Americans are asking, 'Who can make it better? Where can we look for help?' And not surprisingly, government is increasingly the answer," said Peter Hart, a Democratic pollster.
Even Republicans see a growing unease as the driving force in the domestic policy resurgence.
"There's no question the economy is good, but it's not a good for everybody," said House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio.). "When you look at family incomes, there hasn't been much rise. But there has been increased health-care costs, increased energy costs. They're nibbling up more than the family budget. It just drives more concerns."
For both parties, domestic policy fights are a welcome break after three election cycles dominated by terrorism and war. Republican and Democratic political leaders say they cannot shy away from the Iraq war. But for much of the year, the fight over the war has only shown Democrats to be ineffectual and Republicans to be intransigent.
For Democrats, a break in that fight could allow them to focus on issues that voters say demand attention. Last year's election victories by Democratic Sens. James Webb in Virginia and Jon Tester in Montana, and by Democratic governors in Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa and Ohio, show that a populist message can prevail even in swing states.
For Republicans, changing the subject is simply a relief.
"I think it is territory that tends to unite us more," said Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-Miss.). "Republicans tend to squabble, but when it's fiscal issues, when it's economic issues, we tend to come together. That's what makes us Republicans."
If so, the GOP may be having an identity crisis. Boehner, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and President Bush have met regularly on what Boehner calls his "rebranding" initiative: winning back for the GOP the mantle of fiscal discipline and limited government.
But in the first big domestic battle on Capitol Hill, 18 Republicans in the Senate and 45 in the House abandoned their leaders to side with the Democrats on a five-year, $35 billion expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program.
House Republicans are expected to muster enough votes to sustain Bush's anticipated veto of the SCHIP bill, but Boehner conceded that Congress is liable to override the promised veto on a $21 billion water-project bill so crammed with home-district projects that it has been denounced by taxpayer and environmental groups alike.
"There's deadlock on Iraq. Bush is intransigent. It's clear we're not going to get the 60 votes to change course on the war. But Republicans are hurting too, so they're breaking with him on all these domestic issues," said Sen. Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.), chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
Indeed, on the domestic front Republicans may be in the same bind that they face on foreign policy: Their conservative base is not where the rest of the country is.
For more than a decade, the Democratic polling firm Hart Research and the Republican firm Public Opinion Strategies have read two propositions to Americans: "Government should do more to solve problems and help meet the needs of people" and "Government is doing too many things better left to businesses and individuals."
In December 1995, at the height of the Republican Revolution, a less-intrusive government won out, 62 percent to 32 percent. This month, a more activist government won out, 55 percent to 38 percent. Independent voters sided with government activism, 52 percent to 39 percent.
But Republican voters, by a margin of 62 to 32 percent, still say government is doing too much.
"The big tectonic plates of American politics are shifting, and the old Republican policies of limited government aren't working like they used to," Schumer said. "Their problem is, the Republican primary vote is still the old George Bush coalition -- strong foreign policy, cut taxes, cut government, family values. But Americans aren't there anymore."
But the same poll did find some hope for the GOP, said Neil Newhouse, a partner at Public Opinion Strategies. Americans said they do not see a role for the federal government in the current mortgage crisis.
"Americans seem to be saying that the problems the country is facing demand a more activist government, but that this does not extend to all issues or every problem," Newhouse said.
That's a difficult needle to thread, but it can be done, said former senator Jim Talent (R-Mo.), a top domestic policy adviser to Republican White House hopeful Mitt Romney. Then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush showed in 2000, with his stand on education and his general slogan of "compassionate conservatism," that Republicans can win on traditional Democratic turf. They can do that again, especially on health care, Talent said.
"Part of what is at the core of the party is smaller government, fiscal restraint," said Sen. Mel Martinez (Fla.), general chairman of the Republican National Committee. "But like in this debate on SCHIP, it's very important that we as Republicans make it clear we are for insuring children."
"It's no longer permissible for us to think 47 million Americans being uninsured is okay," Martinez said.
more...
house searchquot;cute hairstyles and
pani_6
07-20 04:26 PM
Is there a web site to check I-140 and I485 status??.
tattoo searchquot;cute hairstyles and
chintu25
01-17 03:18 PM
IV is the only hope guys .
No mention of Visa numbers
To add to misery now ....the newly trained employees will look at the cases. Simple and cost effective action would be to release the visa numbers
A BIG DUH
No mention of Visa numbers
To add to misery now ....the newly trained employees will look at the cases. Simple and cost effective action would be to release the visa numbers
A BIG DUH
more...
pictures hairstyles and colors.
vxb2004
10-11 08:16 PM
Yes you can..but you will lose your H1B status. Read this article..very informative.
http://www.hooyou.com/h-1b/I-485%20filing%20memo.htm
Good Luck
http://www.hooyou.com/h-1b/I-485%20filing%20memo.htm
Good Luck
dresses waves hairstyles color. ogdogg
STAmisha
12-26 10:54 AM
I filed my I-485 on july 2, 2007. Now I'm moving to new home. What do I need to do? How do I inform USCIS?
Thanks
Thanks
more...
makeup hair styles cute short for
thesparky007
04-01 12:49 AM
*reported posts* - 5 million
girlfriend cute hairstyle short- with red
ncmahesh
07-14 12:15 PM
it was actually recjected it was kept under 221 g in uk , he was returing to india. so he asked embassy to retrun all the papers. so they gave back
hairstyles Short Blonde Emo Hairstyles
GWB
05-21 05:07 AM
Sorry, I can't get it to post any other way for sum reason... :s
uslegals
07-18 12:58 PM
Hello friends -
My Receipt notice states that RECEIVED DATE for my 485 is July 17, 2007 and the NOTICE DATE is September 14, 2007.
In my USCIS online account when my click on my 485 RECEIPT No. it states -"CASE recd. & pending" ...On September 14, 2007, we received this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS, and mailed you a notice......
Shouldn't this state that they recd. the case on July 17, 2007.?? Can it be true that their system is showing a recd. date of 9/14 when actually the recd. date on the actual notice/797 is 7/17/07.
How many folks are seeing this.?? Is this how it is supposed to be..I mean is it normal for them to generate a default message like this using the NOTICE DATE when you click ur case #..??
CHEERS.!
My Receipt notice states that RECEIVED DATE for my 485 is July 17, 2007 and the NOTICE DATE is September 14, 2007.
In my USCIS online account when my click on my 485 RECEIPT No. it states -"CASE recd. & pending" ...On September 14, 2007, we received this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS, and mailed you a notice......
Shouldn't this state that they recd. the case on July 17, 2007.?? Can it be true that their system is showing a recd. date of 9/14 when actually the recd. date on the actual notice/797 is 7/17/07.
How many folks are seeing this.?? Is this how it is supposed to be..I mean is it normal for them to generate a default message like this using the NOTICE DATE when you click ur case #..??
CHEERS.!
black_logs
05-26 03:33 PM
Guys, looks like we are facing a veiled attack from the rival groups. It is evident from some posts. Since morning we are busy repeatedly saying same things to these people. I am deleting all their posts and banning their user ids. If you see any damaging post report it to us clicking on the exclamation mark next to the post.
ED: Please click on the exclamation mark next to the post instead of replying to this thread. Thanks
ED: Please click on the exclamation mark next to the post instead of replying to this thread. Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment